Harry Brook vs Shubman Gill: Who Is Better? Batting & Stats Comparison

Cricket has always been a game of competition, from Sachin Tendulkar vs Ricky Ponting to Virat Kohli vs Steve Smith. In recent years, two young stars have emerged from different cricketing cultures but with a single goal: to reach the top of world cricket. They are England’s Harry Brook and India’s Shubman Gill.

Both are elegant, fearless and talented batsmen who have made their mark at the international level. In this blog, we will delve into their statistics, comparing their performances across formats to find out who is currently at the top.

Player Profile

Both were born in 1999. This puts them in the same age group as the next generation of stars who are expected to lead their respective countries in the future.

Performance Comparison in Test Cricket

Harry Brook’s Test strike rate of 90+ is almost unheard of in modern cricket. It reflects his aggressive “baseball” approach under England’s new philosophy. He can take a game away from the opposition in a single session.

On the other hand, Shubman Gill has shown immense potential but has not been as consistent in Tests. His technique is strong, but he is still adjusting to the different conditions outside Asia.

Comparison Of Performances in One Day Internationals (ODI)

Gill’s figures in ODIs are at a high level, especially with his average approaching 60 and a double century to his name. He has performed better than many experienced players at such a young age.

Harry Brook, while impressive at times, has not been as consistent in ODIs as he has been in England’s packed lineup.

Comparison Of Performances in T20 Internationals (T20I)

Both Brook and Gill are aggressive T20 players. While Brook often plays the role of a finisher or middle-order dasher, Gill usually opens the innings and makes his game around the clock.

Brook’s strike rate of around 147 reflects his ability, but Gill’s ability to score a T20I century as an opener gives him the edge in adaptability.

Read More: Virat Kohli vs David Warner: Who Is Better? Batting & Stats Comparison

Comparison in Franchise Leagues (IPL and The Hundred)  

In the IPL, Shubman Gill has been a consistent match-winner, leading the run chart in 2023 and winning the Orange Cap. His maturity, ability to adapt to situations and calm nature make him one of the most reliable batsmen in franchise cricket.

Harry Brook scored a memorable century for SRH in a mixed IPL debut season in 2023 but struggled for consistency overall. He is still adapting to subcontinental conditions.

Key Strengths Comparison

Achievements And Highlights

Shubman Gill

• Youngest Indian to score a double century in ODIs (208 vs New Zealand, 2023).
• Orange Cap winner with 890 runs in IPL 2023.
• ICC ODI Cricketer of the Year 2023 Nominated.
• Consistent top-order run-getter for India in white-ball cricket.

Harry Brook

• Average 80 in his debut Test series in Pakistan (2022).
• Scored centuries in both Tests and T20s in his first year of international cricket.
• One of England’s key players in the baseball era.
• Winner of the T20 World Cup (2022) with England.

Last And Final Verdict

Both Gill and Harry represent a new generation of world cricket that is aggressive, confident and fearless. However, if we were to pick the better overall batsman at present, the answer would lean slightly towards Shubman Gill. His ability to dominate in ODIs, lead his IPL team with consistency in Tests makes him a more well-rounded performer across all formats. Harry Brook’s aggressive Test form is unmatched, but he still needs time to build his legacy in limited-overs cricket.

Payout: Winner, Shubman Gill (1 of 2 formats, T20 match tied)

Conclusion

Both Harry Brook and Shubman Gill are young, but already shaping modern cricket with their contrasting styles. Brook thrives on aggression and intent, breaking stereotypes in Test cricket. Gill shines through grace, composure and classical run-scoring consistency. Currently, Gill is slightly ahead overall, but with both players only in their mid-20s, cricket fans are lucky to see the rise of two future greats.

FAQs: Questions & Answers

Q1. Who is more consistent, Gill or Harry?

Shubman Gill is more consistent overall, especially in ODIs and IPL. His technique and temper allow him to play longer innings, while Brook is more explosive but a little inconsistent. Brook often plays high-risk cricket, which works wonders in Tests but can lead to ups and downs in the white-ball format.

Q2. Who has a better record in Test cricket?

Harry Brook currently holds the better Test record. With an average of close to 50 and a strike rate of 90+, Brook has revolutionised England’s batting style under Ben Stokes and Brendon McCullum. Gill, while technically good, is yet to reach his full potential in Tests.

Q3. Who is better in limited-overs cricket?

Shubman Gill has dominated the limited-overs format. His ODI average is around 60 and his consistency in the IPL places him among the top young batsmen in the world. Brook, despite being powerful, has yet to achieve the same consistency in ODIs and T20Is.

Q4. Who has achieved more in franchise cricket (IPL and The Hundred)?

Gill has achieved more in franchise cricket. He won the Orange Cap in IPL 2023, scored 3 centuries in a season and led Gujarat Titans to the final. Brook has shown promising performances in The Hundred and IPL but has not been able to make an impact yet.

Q5. Who has more potential in the future?

Both have huge potential, but their paths are different. Shubman Gill can become the next Indian batting legend in all formats, similar to Virat Kohli’s role. Meanwhile, Harry Brook can redefine England’s middle-order batting in the limited-overs format.